When others take note of the term Unified Theory, some times called the Grand Unified Theory, or perhaps "Theory of Everything," they may think serotonin in terms of physics, where a Unified Theory, or perhaps individual concept able to identifying the dynamics of the interrelationships among nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces, would reconcile apparently non-complementary areas of a variety of field theories to produce one single detailed set of equations.
Such an idea could potentially unlock all the secrets of nature as well as the universe itself, or perhaps as theoretical physicist Michio Katu, puts it "an equation an inch long which would enable us to read the mind of God." That is just how important single theories could be. However, unified theories do not have to deal with such heady subjects as physics or maybe the dynamics of the universe itself, but may be put on to much more routine things, in cases like this nutrition.
Regardless of the subject, a unified theory, as sated previously, seeks to explain seemingly incompatible areas of various theories. On this page I attempt to unify seemingly incompatible or opposing views regarding nutrition, specifically, what is most likely the longest running debate in the food sciences: calories vs. macro nutrients.
One particular school, I would say the' old school' of nutrition, keeps weight reduction or extra weight is about energy, and "a calorie is a calorie," regardless of the source (e.g., carbs, fats, or perhaps proteins). They base their role on a variety of lines of evidence to show up to that particular conclusion.
The other school, I will call more the' new school' of thought on the issue, would state that gaining or perhaps losing weight is really about where energy are available from (e.g., carbohydrates, fat, and proteins), and that dictates weight reduction or fat gain. Meaning, they think, the "calorie is a calorie" mantra of the old school is incorrect. They too come to this particular conclusion using different lines of evidence.
This has been a continuing debate among men and women in the field of nutrition, biology, physiology, as well as numerous additional disciplines, for years. The result of which includes led to conflicting advice and also a good deal of confusion by the overall public, as well as numerous medical professionals as well as other groups.

Before I go any further, two key points that are vital to understand about any single theory:

An excellent unified theory is simple, concise, and understandable actually to lay people. However, underneath, or behind that theory, is sometimes a good deal of information that can eat up numerous volumes of books. And so, for me to outline all the info I've employed best metabolism booster to lose weight - www.issaquahreporter.com - get to these conclusions, would have a huge book, if not several and is far beyond the extent of this post.

Writer Bio
He is the creator of Bodybuilding Revealed which helps you precisely how to gain sound muscle mass drug free and Weight loss Revealed which reveals just how to become lean, ripped and healthy completely naturally.
Find out more at http://www.bodybuildingrevealed.com as well as [ http://www.fatlossrevealed.com]